<< Prev :x:
>> Next :x:

Open Letter to David Chaytor

Today I emailed the following to my MP, David Chaytor. David was the subject of an expenses scandal last year, and in February 2010 he was convicted under the Theft Act for false accounting. He has been suspended from the Labour party and will not stand in the next General Election, to be held in the UK on 6th May.

Unsurprisingly, David was not one of the 236 MPs who bothered to vote for or against the 2010 Digital Economy Bill which is causing a storm on twitter for (amongst other things) the powers it will grant ISPs to disconnect users suspected of copyright infringement without a fair trial, and the legal requirement for ISPs to block access to websites “which the court is satisfied has been, is being or is likely to be used for or in connection with an activity that infringes copyright”. The wording of this is especially dangerous, as technically it includes search engines like Google, which you can easily use to find mp3s.

I had previously emailed David twice in March concerning the bill, and aside from requesting my details to confirm that I was indeed a constituent, he did not respond, did not vote, and did not even attend the second reading. Here is my third and potentially final email.

FAO David.

I appreciate that since the expenses scandal and your subsequent suspension you’ve been forced into a more submissive role, but transparency is the trial of your occupation. If you will put yourself in the public eye, then you must accept that you will occasionally be subject to scrutiny, ridicule or humiliation.

The real challenge is to roll with those punches without losing your footing, respect or dignity, and without letting it compromise your duties as an MP. You must ensure that you continue to respect the position that you have been elected into by your trusting constituents, and continue to represent them to the best of your abilities.

Whether or not you care about the issues concerned is irrelevant. Whether or not you are able to stand for the coming election is irrelevant. You still have an obligation to research the issues involved and make an informed stand on behalf of the general public. You had the opportunity to win a little bit of respect back by making an argument against the badly-written Digital Economy Bill, and you just ducked.

Please don’t let a scandal be your final contribution to the country. Don’t curl up in a corner. You are in a privileged position now- you’re a man with the public’s interest and nothing to lose. Please stay sharp and do something good to be remembered by.

But I suspect that I’m wasting my time with words.

Instead of just voting against your party, I intend to actively campaign against Labour for the coming election. I am a professional graphic designer by occupation, and I’m sure that an opposing party candidate in the Bury North area will appreciate my support.

Actions speak a little louder.

Kind Regards.

3 Comments
  1. liamjamesliamjames says:

    Sex! Hugs! Blogs! Open Letter to David Chaytor – http://www.liamjames.com/2010/04/08/open...

    ReplyReply

    via Twitoaster

  2. Liam says:

    Mr Chaytor’s Response:

    Thank you for your emails concerning some aspects of the Digital Economy Bill, which completed its final stages in the House of Commons last night. I do apologise that I was unable to reply before now, and I hope this has not caused you any inconvenience.

    As you will be aware, the Bill is a wide ranging piece of legislation designed to strengthen Britain’s digital and creative industries in the light of rapid technological change. The Bill was developed after a long period of national debate and builds on the proposals contained in the Government’s White Paper, ‘Digital Britain’, published in June 2009. It received broad support in both Houses of Parliament from all political parties, and a wide ranging coalition of industry groups. The Second Reading of the Bill took place on Tuesday evening of this week and was agreed without a vote.

    However, I do appreciate that concerns have been expressed by a number of my constituents about some details of the Bill, notably to the clauses related to unlawful file sharing. It is indisputable that copyright infringement represents a major threat to the growth of the digital and creative industries in the UK. However, I fully accept that the earlier text of the Bill may not have included measures which were seen to be practical or workable. As a result the Government introduced amendments which clarify the proposals and provide for a further period of consultation on future regulations.

    I should also stress that the fears expressed in some quarters about the draconian measures included in the Bill simply do not reflect the reality. There was a lively debate on this during the final stages last night and some members called for a further period of delay before legislating on copyright infringement.

    However, this was rejected and I am confident that the Bill in its current form, with the necessary safeguards, will serve its purpose of strengthening our digital and creative industries, without impacting adversely on harmless and entirely legitimate activities in the way that some campaigners have feared.

    However, it is clear that the debate about the ethics of different forms of file sharing, and the technical means of reducing copyright infringement, will continue and no-one is under any illusions that there are simple solutions to some of these complex problems. What is indisputable is that the growth of digital technologies will only continue within a framework of appropriate regulation designed to deal with the worst examples of copyright infringement.

    For your information I have included a more detailed briefing on some measures of the Bill which my office has prepared. I also attach a briefing from the Creative Coalition Campaign, outlining why they supported this aspect of the Bill so strongly.

    Further information about the context of Digital Britain and the range of measures included in the Digital Economy Bill is included on the website of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills: (http://interactive.bis.gov.uk/ ) and (http://interactive.bis.gov.uk/digitalbritain/digital-economy-bill/)

    You may be interested to read more about this if you have not already done so, although I should point out that the website does not yet provide an update on the final stages of the Bill, and may not be updated now till after the election.

    Thank you for writing to me on this important matter. I apologise to you again for the delay in my response.

    Yours sincerely

    David Chaytor

    ReplyReply
  3. I'd also like to point out for the record that this was the third email I sent him, and the first two were actually about the DEBill.He actually replied to the above email, and I've pasted it in the entirety as a reply to the OP.

    ReplyReply
Leave a Reply




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting